Neobanks: Licensing Overview and Ratings

Regulation

Concept

A neobank is a financial company that opens and maintains client accounts without a banking license, under one of the lighter regulatory regimes. These regimes are called different things in different jurisdictions, but economically they represent a single model: the company is permitted to hold client funds and process payments—but without the rights of a bank.

Neobanks emerged as regulators' response to the problem of serving small and medium-sized businesses. A full banking license is too heavy and expensive—high minimum capital, Basel III adequacy ratios, separate treasury and risk management functions, regular audited reporting and supervision, direct account with the central bank. This model does not pay off for a small client: compliance costs are comparable to the revenue from them.

The EU introduced the first such regime with Directive 2000/46/EC on electronic money institutions (2000); Directive 2007/64/EC (PSD1) added payment institutions in 2007. Both are lighter regimes with reduced requirements for capital, team, and reporting. Today they exist in the EU, UK, Singapore, Hong Kong, USA, and dozens of other jurisdictions. Specific types of licenses, regulators, and provider examples are in the jurisdictions section below.

Under these regimes, several generations of companies have grown—from Wise and Revolut to Airwallex. Their turnover is comparable to large second-tier banks (Wise had £118.5 billion in cross-border transfers for the 2024 financial year), even though legally they are neobanks with capital in the hundreds of thousands of euros, not banks.

A neobank is a working business account. A safe for savings and reserves is a bank.

What is "lighter" in the payment regime

A neobank license differs from a banking license in both rights and requirements. A company with a payment license operates within three structural limitations.

First—client funds cannot be accepted as deposits on the company's own balance sheet. Client money is not recorded as the company's obligation to depositors and does not finance its active operations. It is held separately, in specially designated accounts at partner banks, or invested in safe instruments—government bonds, money market funds. This mechanism is called safeguarding and is enshrined in each regime separately: for UK API/e-money license—in Electronic Money Regulations 2011 (section 20) and Payment Services Regulations 2017, for EU—in Article 7 EMD2 and Article 10 PSD2, for Hong Kong—in C&ED license conditions for MSO.

Second—lending from client funds is prohibited. Credit operations are either completely prohibited or permitted only from the company's own capital. This blocks the fundamental banking model—fractional reserve banking, where a bank lends more from accepted deposits than its own capital.

Third—no direct correspondent account with the central bank. Settlements in dollars, euros, pounds, Singapore dollars, Hong Kong dollars go through a partner bank that holds a master account at the US Federal Reserve, European Central Bank, Bank of England, MAS, or HKMA. For the client, this means dependence on the stability of the relationship between their neobank and its partner bank.

In exchange for these limitations, the regime has reduced requirements for capital, team, reporting, and supervision.

Client fund protection: safeguarding

There is no government deposit insurance at neobanks. UK FSCS, US FDIC, Singapore SDIC, European national DGS—all these schemes work only for licensed banks and do not extend to funds in neobanks. Instead of insurance, segregation is applied: client funds are physically separated from the company's own funds and in case of the company's bankruptcy are not included in its bankruptcy estate. Legally, this is a trust structure—the company holds funds on behalf of the client, but not as its own.

Segregation protects against bankruptcy of the neobank itself. It does not protect against bankruptcy of the partner bank holding the segregated funds, and does not protect against operational collapse of the intermediary through which settlements pass.

Three precedents that showed the limits of safeguarding

Regulatory trends 2024–2026

European Union: PSD3 + PSR and MiCA. The PSD3 package (licensing directive) and PSR (Payment Services Regulation—directly applicable regulation on conduct rules) was agreed at the end of 2025 and approved by the EU Council in April 2026; publication in the Official Journal is expected in 2026, application—approximately from 2028. Payment institution and electronic money institution licenses are merged into one; verification of payee name and IBAN matching is introduced, mandatory reimbursement for fraud with sender impersonation, and stricter safeguarding. In parallel, MiCA (Regulation 2023/1114) regulates crypto-assets: rules for CASP apply from December 30, 2024; the transitional period for previously operating companies expired on 1 July 2026 (it closed earlier in some countries).

United Kingdom: safeguarding reform. Following consultation CP24/20, FCA adopted rules (PS25/12): from May 7, 2026, an enhanced safeguarding regime applies—detailed accounting, daily reconciliation and a monthly regulatory return, audit, resolution pack. Full regime with statutory trust over client funds is postponed and depends on legislative reform expected in 2026. Separately, from October 2024, mandatory APP fraud reimbursement applies (£85k limit, split equally between sending and receiving bank).

USA: Synapse aftermath. In response to the Synapse collapse, FDIC proposed in October 2024 the Recordkeeping for Custodial Accounts rule—named beneficiary accounting and daily reconciliation for custodial accounts with transactional functionality; as of 2026 it remains at the proposal stage. Banking-as-a-service model sponsor banks received a series of consent orders (Evolve, Lineage, Blue Ridge, Cross River). Regulators place compliance responsibility on the bank, not the fintech.

Singapore and Hong Kong: stablecoins. MAS finalized the stablecoin regime back in August 2023 (100% reserves, redemption at par within five business days, prohibition on lending by issuer), and from September 2024 introduced protection measures for DPT providers—asset segregation, about 90% in cold storage, prohibition on lending and staking retail assets. In Hong Kong, from August 1, 2025, the Stablecoins Ordinance applies: issuance of fiat-pegged stablecoins requires HKMA license.

When a neobank is suitable—and when it is not

A neobank is appropriate as an operational business and individual entrepreneur tool. It opens accounts faster (usually from several hours to several weeks versus several months at a bank), has softer KYC approach, works better with multi-currency revenue and marketplaces. Specific scenarios:

• incoming revenue from clients and marketplaces—Amazon, eBay, Shopify, Etsy, AliExpress;
• payments to contractors and suppliers in several currencies simultaneously;
• currency conversions at mid-market rate without hidden margin;
• corporate cards for team with expense separation;
• B2B settlements in Southeast Asia without opening a local company;
• project and one-time payments where opening a bank account takes longer than the project lasts.

A neobank is not suitable for storing reserves above the deposit insurance amount of one jurisdiction, for credit lines and letters of credit, for prime brokerage and securities settlements, for long-term capital management and family office services. For these tasks—a bank.

Jurisdictions and licenses

European Union — Payment Institution and e-money license (PSD2 + EMD2)

Single license passport: a national competent authority of one country issues authorization, it is valid in all 27 EU countries and, under the EEA agreement, in Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway as well. Licenses are divided into three types.

One EU e-money authorization passported across the EEA means one regulator and thirty markets; the route is set out in EMI licence in Luxembourg.

PSD2 account-service license. Covers transfers, merchant acquiring, payment processing, open banking services. Minimum capital—from €20k to €125k depending on service type.

EMD2 e-money license. Covers issuance of electronic money (e-money) plus everything permitted to neobanks. Minimum capital—€350k.

Crypto-Asset Service Provider (MiCA, Regulation 2023/1114). Covers crypto-asset operations—exchange, custodial storage, transfer. Rules for CASP apply from December 30, 2024; the transitional period for previously operating companies expired on 1 July 2026 (it closed earlier in some countries). Can be a separate license or addition to e-money license.

Where it's heading. The PSD3 + PSR package was agreed at the end of 2025 and approved by the EU Council in April 2026; publication expected in 2026, application—approximately from 2028. PSR is a directly applicable regulation (conduct rules), PSD3 is a directive (licensing); neobank and e-money licenses are merged into one.

📎 Popular licensing jurisdictions. Lithuania (Bank of Lithuania—e-money license for Revolut Payments UAB before obtaining banking license, also Bitstamp, Lemonway, PingPong DigiTech; most popular jurisdiction 2018–2023 due to fast process). Estonia (active in VASP / crypto category). Ireland (Central Bank of Ireland—Stripe Payments Europe, Payoneer Europe; more expensive than Lithuania, but higher correspondent trust). Netherlands (De Nederlandsche Bank—Airwallex Netherlands, Mollie). Malta (MFSA—niche e-money license and VASP).

📎 Who operates under this regime. Payoneer Europe (Ireland), PingPong (Lithuania), Wise Europe SA (Belgium), Stripe Payments Europe (Ireland). Among neobanks with full EU banking license—Revolut (Lithuania), N26 (BaFin, Germany), Bunq (Netherlands), Lunar (Denmark); France's Qonto, the largest SMB fintech in Europe, still runs on a payment licence while it applies for a French banking licence of its own.

United Kingdom — FCA (Authorised Payment Institution / e-money license)

After Brexit, the UK maintained a parallel regime, separate from the European one. Regulator—FCA, main structures under Payment Services Regulations 2017 and Electronic Money Regulations 2011.

Authorised payment services license (API). Minimum capital—€125k. Covers transfers, acquiring, money remittance. Without the right to issue electronic money.

Authorised Electronic Money Institution (e-money license). Minimum capital—€350k. Covers issuance of electronic money plus everything permitted to API.

In both cases, safeguarding of client funds is mandatory—either through a segregated account at an approved bank or through an equivalent mechanism (insurance, investment in approved instruments).

Where it's heading. Following consultation CP24/20, FCA adopted rules (PS25/12): from May 7, 2026, an enhanced safeguarding regime applies—detailed accounting, daily reconciliation and a monthly regulatory return, audit. Full regime with statutory trust over client funds is postponed. Separately, from October 2024, mandatory APP fraud reimbursement applies (£85k limit).

📎 Who operates under this regime. Wise Payments Limited (FRN 900507), Revolut Ltd (e-money license from 2015; banking license with restrictions—2024, full PRA authorization—2026), WorldFirst UK Limited, Currenxie (UK), Payoneer UK Limited, Airwallex UK Limited (FRN 900876), Wirex (UK e-money license plus crypto card), Tide. Starling Bank from 2018—full UK bank under PRA supervision, and among SME lenders the fully licensed names are the profitable Allica Bank and OakNorth, which is buying a bank in the US.

Hong Kong — Money Service Operator and Stored Value Facility

The Hong Kong regime consists of two independent tracks with different regulators and different weight.

Money Service Operator (MSO). Regulator—Customs and Excise Department under Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Ordinance, Cap. 615. Two-year license with mandatory renewal, no minimum statutory capital required by law, but regulator assesses "sufficient resources" upon application. The licence and renewal fees themselves are set by Schedule 3 to Cap. 615 and were revised with effect from 15 May 2026 (Amendment of Schedule 3 Notice 2026) — a regulator fee, not a provider tariff. Covers money transfers (including SWIFT, SEPA, Hong Kong FPS), currency exchange, virtual asset operations subject to AML/CFT compliance. Does not cover deposit-taking, stored value issuance, lending as standalone business. Details — MSO licence Hong Kong.

Stored Value Facility (SVF). Regulator—Hong Kong Monetary Authority under Payment Systems and Stored Value Facilities Ordinance, Cap. 584. Minimum paid-up capital—HKD 25 million. License for e-wallets, prepaid cards, stored-value products. Details — SVF licence Hong Kong.

🍓 SVF is much heavier than MSO. Among neobanks for business, only a few have full SVF: Airwallex through subsidiary UniCard Solution Limited (SVF registry number SVF0009), plus several consumer wallets (Octopus, Alipay HK, WeChat Pay HK, HKT Tap & Go, PayMe from HSBC).

Digital banks. In the first half of 2019, HKMA issued eight full banking licenses to virtual banks—ZA Bank, livi bank, Mox Bank, WeLab Bank, Ant Bank, Airstar Bank, Fusion Bank, Ping An OneConnect Bank; the banks launched in 2020, and in 2024 the HKMA replaced the term "virtual banks" with "digital banks". These are no longer neobanks in the strict sense: deposits up to HKD 800k are protected through Hong Kong Deposit Protection Scheme.

Stablecoins. From August 1, 2025, the Stablecoins Ordinance applies: issuance of fiat-pegged stablecoins requires HKMA license (HKD 25M capital, 100% reserves, redemption at par in approximately one business day). First licenses issued in 2026.

📎 Who operates under this regime. Currenxie, Airwallex Hong Kong, FOMO Pay Hong Kong, Wise Payments Hong Kong, Payoneer Hong Kong, World First Asia Limited.

Singapore — Payment Services Act 2019 (SPI / MPI / DPT)

From 2019, Singapore has a unified law that replaced fragmented regulation. Regulator—Monetary Authority of Singapore. Three license categories.

Money-Changing Licence—no limit; currency exchange only.

Standard Payment Institution (SPI)—up to SGD 3M per payment service; medium operators.

Major Payment Institution (MPI)—no limit; large operators.

Within the license, MAS specifies specific permitted services: account opening and maintenance, domestic transfers, cross-border transfers, merchant acquiring, e-money issuance, digital payment token (DPT) services, currency exchange. "The provider has MPI" is insufficient fact; need to check the specific service set in the registry.

🍓 DPT is a separate regulated service for cryptocurrencies. MAS issues it very restrictively: around thirty companies in the public registry. Among them FOMO Pay, DBS Vickers, Independent Reserve, Coinbase Singapore, Crypto.com.

Stablecoins and client protection. MAS finalized the stablecoin regime in August 2023 (100% reserves, redemption at par within five business days, prohibition on lending by issuer). From September 2024, protection measures for DPT providers apply: client asset segregation, about 90% in cold storage, prohibition on lending and staking retail assets.

📎 Who operates under this regime. Airwallex Singapore Pte. Ltd. (MPI), Wise Asia-Pacific Pte. Ltd. (MPI), Payoneer Singapore Pte. Ltd. (MPI), FOMO Pay Pte. Ltd. (MPI + DPT).

USA — money transmitter licences and partner banking

In the USA, neobanks are licensed at the state level. To cover the entire country, money transmitter licenses are needed in all fifty states plus District of Columbia, plus federal registration with FinCEN as money services business. Obtaining full coverage typically takes three to five years and over ten million dollars in regulatory costs, which is why some of the larger players go straight for a charter of their own: Brazil's Nubank secured the largest foreign de novo charter in US history, and Klarna filed for a Utah ILC. Full coverage is held by Wise US Inc., Payoneer Inc., Stripe Payments Company. PingPong Global Solutions LLC has most states, exact list published in FinCEN MSB Registrant Search.

Partner bank model. The fintech company has neither money transmitter license nor banking license. It operates as an interface on top of one or more real US banks that have master accounts at the Federal Reserve. The client formally has an account at the partner bank, deposits up to $250k per partner bank are covered by FDIC. Externally the client sees a regular neobank account. Legally it is a bank deposit arranged through the fintech company's interface. Business finance super-apps such as Ramp sit on the same rails, layering cards and spend management on top of partner banks.

Who on which bank. Mercury—Choice Financial Group, Evolve Bank & Trust. Brex—Column N.A., JPMorgan Chase. Cash App Business—Sutton Bank, Lincoln Savings Bank. Bluevine—Coastal Community Bank. Chime—The Bancorp Bank, Stride Bank.

⚠️ The partner bank model does not insure against intermediary operational collapse. The Synapse case (2024) showed: even correctly accounted funds at the partner bank can become inaccessible for months due to accounting discrepancies. In response, FDIC proposed in October 2024 the Recordkeeping for Custodial Accounts rule (named beneficiary accounting, daily reconciliation); as of 2026 it remains at the proposal stage. Regulators meanwhile placed responsibility on sponsor banks—series of consent orders (Evolve, Lineage, Blue Ridge, Cross River).

Canada — FINTRAC MSB and RPAA

Federal registration with Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre as money services business (AML). From 2024, Payment Service Provider registration with Bank of Canada under Retail Payment Activities Act (RPAA) was added: application window—November 2024, transitional period until September 8, 2025, after which operational risk management and client fund safeguarding are mandatory. The Bank of Canada began publishing the PSP registry on September 8, 2025 and adds to it as reviews—including national security screening—are completed; it does not disclose a total count of registrants. RPAA does not require minimum capital and does not provide deposit insurance.

Additionally, in Quebec, Autorité des marchés financiers license is needed, in British Columbia—registration with BC Financial Services Authority. There is no separate full payment institution license at the federal level—many Canadian neobanks operate through partner bank model.

Providers. KOHO issues cards and maintains accounts through Peoples Trust Company (registered as PSP in 2025), Wealthsimple Cash—through partner banks (in first PSP registry). EQ Bank—full digital bank (Equitable Bank, OSFI license), deposits covered by CDIC up to CAD 100k. Wise joined Payments Canada in 2026; Revolut entered the Canadian market but shut down operations in 2021.

Puerto Rico — International Financial Entity

Regulator—Office of the Commissioner of Financial Institutions (OCIF). Special International Financial Entity license under Act 273-2012—this is a banking license (not neobank) with three structural differences from a regular US bank. IFE serves only non-residents of Puerto Rico. Corporate tax is preferential—4% instead of standard 21% under US federal law. IFE deposits are not FDIC-insured. Minimum capital raised by 2024 amendments (around $10 million).

📎 Providers. FV Bank—operating IFE with separate authorization for digital asset custody and acceptance of USDT/USDC/PYUSD with conversion to dollars. Euro Pacific Bank was an IFE and was liquidated by OCIF in 2022 for compliance violations.

Georgia — National Bank of Georgia (bank or PSP)

National Bank of Georgia issues two different types of licenses that are often confused.

Commercial banking licence—full banking functionality, deposits, loans. Deposits insured by Georgian Deposit Insurance up to 50,000 lari per depositor — raised from 30,000 lari on 1 April 2026.

Payment Service Provider—transfers and payments without deposit-taking. No insurance.

🍓 Pave Bank operates under an NBG banking licence: the National Bank of Georgia issued digital banking licence No. 305 on 14 December 2023 — with restrictions, the first seven months in test mode, full banking operations authorised from 12 July 2024; the NBG register of licensed commercial banks lists it as JSC Pave Bank Georgia. It holds no PSP licence. Launched in 2024, focus on fintech companies and funds, with separate authorization for digital asset operations; investors include Tether and Wintermute. The same Georgian licence underpins Hashbank, a digital bank that builds cryptocurrency operations directly into its app.

Australia — ASIC AFSL (PSP reform)

Australian Securities and Investments Commission issues Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Under this license operate neobanks, acquirers, FX businesses (plus AUSTRAC registration). Full banking license—Authorised Deposit-taking Institution (ADI)—issued separately by Australian Prudential Regulation Authority.

Where it's heading. In 2024–2025, Treasury launched Payments System Modernisation reform: separate PSP licensing regime based on modified AFSL with seven payment functions (including stored-value) and APRA prudential supervision, including for stablecoin issuers. Draft (Tranche 1A) published October 9, 2025; transitional period—18 months.

📎 Providers. Airwallex Pty Ltd (AFSL 487221), Wise Australia, Revolut Australia, WorldFirst.

Kazakhstan — AIFC / AFSA (Providing Money Services)

Astana International Financial Centre—separate jurisdiction within Kazakhstan with English-based law. Regulator—Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA). Providing Money Services regime introduced in phases: phase 1 (definitions, capital requirements, digital asset use)—from October 13, 2025; phase 2 (client protection, cyber resilience)—from January 13, 2026. At launch—about ten licensed providers.

📎 Outside the AIFC perimeter, in the regular Kazakhstan jurisdiction, operates Freedom Bank Kazakhstan—a full commercial bank under ARDFM supervision, while settlements for the Kazakh crypto zone run through Alatau City Bank.

Mainland China — PBOC + SAFE

External access to the Chinese banking system is restricted by foreign exchange control through State Administration of Foreign Exchange, special rules for non-residents, and strict international transfer control regime. Non-bank payment organization licenses are issued by PBOC: from May 1, 2024, updated Provisions on Non-bank Payment Organizations apply, basic registered capital—from CNY 100 million. Foreign providers typically operate through licensed Chinese partners.

Providers. Lianlian Pay has a Chinese payment license from PBOC plus money transmitter licenses in USA and UK FCA registration. WorldFirst from 2019 is part of Ant International, the group around Alipay. Among Chinese regional banks for foreign companies with import-export flows, Zhejiang Chouzhou Commercial Bank (CZCB) is available—bank from Yiwu city, historical center of wholesale trade with worldwide exports.

Offshore banking centers

Dominica, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent, Bahamas, British Virgin Islands issue banking licenses, but regulatory supervision is weaker, correspondent relationships are limited, and most tier-1 banks worldwide treat them with caution.

📎 EQI Bank and The Kingdom Bank—Dominica. Suitable for niche tasks (crypto-asset storage, multi-currency accounts without European KYC). Not suitable as replacement for tier-1 banks.

Crypto 2026: the second licensing contour

Until recently a neobank was described by a single licence — the payment one (PI or EMI). By 2026 the same neobank has acquired a second, independent regulatory contour. As soon as the app shows a "buy crypto" line or a stablecoin balance, a separate regime switches on — MiCA, and with it the CASP licence. Many of the players listed above, from Revolut to bunq, now hold or rent both licences at once.

Where this contour came from. Before MiCA, crypto worked under a patchwork of national VASP registrations (per AMLD5): a separate registration in each country with different requirements. MiCA replaced this with a single CASP authorisation passported across the EU — the same logic as the e-money licence.

The rules apply from 30 December 2024; the transitional period for legacy VASPs expired on 1 July 2026 (Article 143(3) of the regulation is a hard ceiling, and several member states closed the window earlier). National windows closed on different dates, so this has to be checked against the provider's country of registration: in the Czech Republic the CASP application had to be filed by 31 July 2025, operating on a legacy VASP registration was permitted only until 1 July 2026, and activity without a CASP is prohibited thereafter — Article 26 of the Digital Finance Act 31/2025 Sb. The current standing of a Czech entity is checked in the Czech National Bank register.

The transition proved painful: of 1,200+ companies with legacy VASP registrations, only about 210 — roughly 17% — converted to a full CASP by the deadline. The rest had to wind down: notify clients and move assets to a licensed CASP or into self-custody. In practice this means the crypto rail inside any neobank that failed to obtain the licence in time has been switched off since July 2026.

Where the licences landed. The CASP register filled up fast: around 199 authorisations across the EEA by April 2026, and 329 in the ESMA register as of 4 August 2026. Germany leads by a wide margin (72), followed by France (35), the Netherlands (29), Cyprus (27) and Malta (22). But for the "adult" licence — both payment and crypto — fintechs went to two jurisdictions. Luxembourg (CSSF) — chosen for prestige and institutional acceptance: PayPal has sat here with a full banking licence since 2007, alongside Amazon and Rakuten; in February 2026 Ripple obtained a full EU EMI licence from the CSSF, and Coinbase arranged its European CASP here as well. Ireland (Central Bank of Ireland) holds Stripe and Payoneer on the payments side and supervises crypto under MiCA since 2025. Both are more expensive than Lithuania, but they buy what Lithuania cannot — correspondent-bank trust.

Stablecoins are the most telling plot. Under MiCA, a euro- or dollar-pegged 1:1 stablecoin is an e-money token (EMT), and only a credit institution or an EMI may issue one. Moreover, from March 2026 even custody and transfer of EMTs may require both MiCA authorisation and a separate PSD2 payment licence — dual licensing, double compliance, double cost. Stablecoin business therefore concentrated where an EMI licence already exists — Luxembourg, Ireland and France. All authorised EMT issuers — around twenty as of April 2026 — combine MiCA with a payment licence; otherwise the token is simply illegal.

Choosing a neobank in 2026, look at which of the two licences it actually holds. A payment licence does not cover crypto; a crypto function without a CASP lives on borrowed time — until the next inspection. The mechanics of how a third-party brand embeds crypto trading under a partner's licence are covered separately — in the guide to operating under someone else's CASP licence.

By 2026 a neobank has two independent licence contours: payment (PI/EMI under PSD2/EMD2) and crypto (CASP under MiCA). A 1:1 stablecoin is an EMT that only an EMI or a bank may issue, so crypto fintech moved where EMIs already are: Luxembourg (CSSF) and Ireland (CBI). Legacy VASP registrations expired on 1 July 2026 — since that date a crypto rail without a CASP is illegal in the EU.

Provider licences, pricing and refusal modes

The jurisdiction table above describes regimes; below is what those regimes look like at named operators — the licence identifier, the published pricing and the grounds for refusal. The identifier is not decoration: within each of these groups different currencies are served by different legal entities under different regulators, so "what licence does the provider hold" is meaningless without "which entity holds my account".

Pricing is the least durable column here. Two other axes separate these providers: which legal entity under which regulator holds a given currency, and what the provider refuses to serve. A holder of its own licence in the client's country carries the flow itself; a provider whose currency runs through a partner loses the corridor together with that partner — the same mechanism as in the Wirecard, Banking Circle and Synapse cases above.

Revolut Private Bank is an announcement, not a live product. On 14 May 2026 Bloomberg reported that Revolut was preparing a private banking arm for the UK and the EU with a £500K entry threshold and a launch "this summer". As of this audit there are no official terms, no pricing and no confirmation of launch, and the announced window has passed. What matters practically is the licensing fork: which entity would book the service — the UK bank, Revolut Ltd, or Lithuania-licensed Revolut Bank UAB serving EU clients — has not been disclosed, and the booking jurisdiction determines deposit protection, governing law and CRS reporting.

Provider matrix: contracting entity, protection of funds, access

The jurisdiction tables answer what a licence permits. This matrix answers the three questions a reader actually faces: which legal person signs the contract, what happens to the balance if that person fails, and whether a given passport and company jurisdiction pass the filter at all. Sixteen providers are taken because each either holds a full banking licence or holds its own payment licence in at least one major market — brands that only resell someone else's rails are left out.

The second half of the same matrix holds the commercial axes: what the provider sells, in which currencies, at what published price, and what sits outside its perimeter.

Read down the protection column and the sixteen names split into four legally different animals. A licensed bank puts a statutory scheme behind the balance: £120,000 under the FSCS, €100,000 under a national DGS. An electronic money or payment institution puts a segregated account at a third bank behind it, which is a claim in an insolvency rather than a payout — Wise names JPMorgan, Citi and Barclays, Qonto names Crédit Mutuel Arkéa and Société Générale. A US partner-bank platform sells FDIC cover that belongs to the partner bank and is stretched by a sweep network: $5m at Mercury, $6m across 24 banks at Brex. An offshore charter offers no scheme at all, and what remains is the correspondent chain.

The residency column filters harder than the price column. bunq and Monzo are excluded for anyone outside the EEA and the UK respectively — not by risk appetite but by the terms of the account. Mercury, Brex and Ramp need a US entity and an EIN rather than a US person behind it, which is why they dominate the non-resident LLC route described in US LLC for non-residents. Airwallex, Currenxie and Aspire sit where the revenue does, in Hong Kong and Singapore. Zenus and the Dominica charters exist precisely for the profile that the first fourteen rows decline.

Pricing separates these providers least of all. A monthly plan of €9 or £9 is noise next to a conversion spread, and the spread is where the money is: Wise publishes from 0.33%, Currenxie 0.35% on majors and 0.10% on USD/HKD, Payoneer about 0.5% and up to 3.5% in some corridors. A provider with no public grid — 3S Money quotes after approval — is not necessarily expensive, but it cannot be compared before onboarding, and the onboarding itself takes three to six weeks there against one to five days at Revolut.

Profile to provider

A worked example shows how little the plan price matters. A company with €600,000 of operating cash that keeps everything at Qonto has €600,000 of segregated claims against Crédit Mutuel Arkéa and Société Générale and no scheme payout at all. The same €600,000 split as €100,000 at Revolut Bank UAB, €100,000 at bunq and the rest at two further licensed banks is covered four times over by national DGS at €100,000 each, and the arithmetic costs about €30 a month in extra subscriptions. Where the balance is US dollars, one Brex account already carries $6m of sweep cover, which is why the partner-bank model wins on protection in the US and loses on it in Europe.

Neobank ratings

The earlier ladder mixed two different things — how good the product is and how well the money is protected. Rebuilt on stated criteria, the ranking runs on the legal perimeter first: licence type, statutory protection, whether the provider carries its own settlement rails, breadth of own functionality and how wide onboarding reaches. Product quality then sorts providers inside a tier rather than across tiers, which is why Airwallex stays the strongest operator among electronic money institutions and still sits below a licensed bank, and why Revolut — a bank in two jurisdictions with FSCS and DGS behind it — cannot sit in the same tier as a Dominica charter.

Tier I — a banking licence of its own with a statutory deposit scheme behind the balance, own settlement rails and broad own functionality. Tier II — its own payment or e-money licence in one or several jurisdictions: safeguarding instead of a scheme, own or diversified rails, working functionality; a licensed bank in a jurisdiction that has no deposit scheme lands here as well. Tier III — the partner-bank model without a licence of its own: the protection belongs to the partner bank, and settlement and compliance depend on it. Tier IV — an offshore charter with no compensation scheme, where the correspondent chain is the only real safeguard.

Regional and specialised providers that the matrix does not price run through the same test: WorldFirst and PingPong on the China corridor, FOMO Pay in Singapore, FV Bank in Puerto Rico, Wirex on crypto rails and Pave Bank in Georgia sit in Tier II where the licence and the rails are their own, and in Tier III where the balance rests on a partner. Stripe is acquiring infrastructure and does not replace a full business account. Private banking and capital storage — in the Banks and Private banking hubs.

Neobank profiles by task.

Universal

• Airwallex—multi-currency account + acquiring + Yield. Strongest in e-commerce and multi-entity treasury.
• Wise Business—most transparent FX (from 0.33% on August 2026 pricing; the rate depends on the currency pair). Best choice for freelancers and SME with simple international settlements.

Hong Kong and SEA

• Aspire—Singapore / Hong Kong for venture-backed startups. Built-in expense management with 1% cashback on SaaS/ads.
• Currenxie—Hong Kong MSO. Strongest in marketplace revenue and settlements with Chinese suppliers.

Marketplace and e-commerce

• Payoneer—direct integrations with Amazon, eBay, AliExpress, Walmart, Upwork, Fiverr. Default choice for marketplace sellers.

United Kingdom and FX

• Equals Money—UK fintech; no longer traded on AIM since 15 April 2025, when the Equals group was taken private by a consortium of TowerBrook, J.C. Flowers and Railsr shareholders. Personal accounts for US persons with FX operations + UK/EU SME with forward contracts.
• 3S Money—UK account for cross-border business. Rare currencies (PLN, CZK, AED) and settlement across four licensing perimeters (FCA, CSSF, DFSA, Hong Kong MSO). RUB appears on the supported-currency list, but under the provider's current public rules payments in Russia and Belarus are not supported and business in those countries is not served.

USA

• Mercury—banking for US LLC through partner banks. FDIC coverage up to $5M through sweep. Default for Y Combinator and non-US founders through Stripe Atlas / doola.