🇷🇺Trusts and CFC Rules: When a Foreign Trust Is a Controlled Foreign Company

What CFC rules do

Controlled foreign company (CFC) rules let a country tax the undistributed profit of a foreign structure that its own residents control. The logic, set out in the OECD's BEPS Action 3, is to stop residents from parking passive income in a low-tax entity abroad and deferring home-country tax indefinitely. Where the rules apply, the resident owner is taxed on the structure's earnings as they arise, before anything is paid out. Most regimes aim at foreign companies; a few reach further, into trusts and foundations.

How the major regimes compare

The regimes have similar mechanisms but different scopes. For corporate taxpayers, the EU's Anti-Tax-Avoidance Directive sets minimum CFC rules based on control and low taxation; Member States apply the permitted income-category or non-genuine-arrangement approaches. An individual's exposure must be checked under national personal tax rules. The United States runs two overlapping systems, Subpart F and GILTI, but both apply to foreign corporations held by U.S. shareholders and are reported on Form 5471. Foreign trusts fall outside those systems: a U.S. owner is caught instead by the grantor-trust rules and by Forms 3520 and 3520-A. See EU ATAD CFC rules, US CFC rules, and US reporting for foreign trusts. (Sources: EU: ATAD).

Russia: when a trust is a CFC

A foreign trust may be a CFC for a Russian-tax-resident settlor or other controlling person. A non-settlor must both control profit-distribution decisions and hold an income, asset-disposal or liquidation-asset right under Article 25.13(12). The settlor of a foreign trust is presumed to be a controlling person from the start. That status carries two duties: to notify the tax authority, and, once the profit threshold is crossed, to pay tax on the structure's earnings. Federal Tax Service.

Control is read broadly. A stake above 25% makes a resident a controlling person, and the bar falls to 10% when Russian residents together hold more than half of the entity. A participation notice is already due once a holding passes 10%. For a trust the test looks past percentages to real influence: who can appoint or remove beneficiaries, direct distributions, or unwind the arrangement. For individuals, control is assessed with regard to its exercise in the interests of a spouse and minor children (art. 25.13 of the Tax Code).

Two Tax Moments

The first moment is tax on undistributed profit. The trust's earnings can be assessed at the controlling person's level even when nothing has been paid out, provided the CFC's profit computed under Russian rules exceeds 10 million rubles for the year. From 2025 that profit flows into the controlling person's personal income tax on the progressive scale that runs from 13% to 22%. The second moment is income tax on an actual distribution to a beneficiary. Sequencing guards against double taxation: profit already taxed at the CFC stage is not taxed a second time when it is later distributed.

How a Distribution Is Taxed

For Russian personal income tax a payout from a trust or foundation to a resident beneficiary is not a dividend but 'other income': it falls into the main tax base and from 2025 is taxed on the progressive 13–22% scale. The exemptions in Article 217 of the Tax Code then sort the outcomes by what the payment actually is:

• a distribution of the structure's current profit → PIT at 13–22% in the year of receipt;
• a distribution of profit the recipient has already declared as CFC profit → exempt under Art. 217 para. 66 on proof of that declaration; the exemption is unavailable for years covered by the fixed-profit election;
• a return of previously contributed property (corpus), not being a profit distribution → exempt under Art. 217 para. 67 up to the documented value contributed by the taxpayer or close family members — though while the structure holds undistributed profit, any payout is deemed a profit distribution whatever its label;
• a liquidation transfer → the historic reliefs (para. 60 for liquidations completed by 1 March 2019, para. 60.2 for receipts in 2022–2024) have lapsed, so a new wind-down defaults to the general regime.

The practical rule follows: trustee resolutions and statements must split income, gains and corpus in advance — rebuilding that split after the transfer rarely convinces anyone.

The Fixed-Profit Election

Rather than recompute the CFC's actual profit every year, a resident may elect to pay tax on a fixed deemed profit. For 2021 through 2024 that figure was 34 million rubles, regardless of how many CFCs the person held. From the 2025 tax period it became graduated by the number of companies: about 27.99 million rubles for one CFC, roughly 52.7 million for two, and about 75.4 million for three, which works out to close to 5 million rubles of tax for each of the first few. The election for 2025 had to be filed by 31 December 2025 and binds the taxpayer for several years, so it fits large, genuinely profitable structures far better than dormant ones.

Reporting and Deadlines

Two filings sit at the centre of the regime. A participation notice falls due within three months of acquiring or changing a qualifying stake. A CFC notice is due every year under Article 25.14(2) of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation (as amended by Federal Law No. 368-FZ of 9 November 2020, the wording in force at 20 August 2026): for individuals by 30 April, and for organisations by 20 March, of the year following the tax period in which the CFC's profit — or its loss — is recognised, whether or not any tax is payable. The next deadline for individuals is 30 April 2027, covering the 2026 tax period. Both are information returns, and their penalties attach to the filing itself, which is why even a loss-making or sub-threshold structure still has to be declared on time. Foreign-account reporting runs in parallel and on its own calendar; see foreign account reporting for Russian residents.

Penalties

Additional penalties apply independently of whether tax is due. A missed participation notice — which also covers establishing a structure without legal personality — costs RUB 50,000 per structure; a missed or inaccurate CFC notice, RUB 500,000 per structure per year (Art. 129.6). Failing to file the documents that substantiate CFC profit adds RUB 500,000 (Art. 126 para. 1.1), and ignoring a tax office demand for CFC documents, RUB 1,000,000 (para. 1.1-1 of Art. 126). A dormant or loss-making trust earns the same penalties as a profitable one if the notices are late; sanctions-related relief covered documents for the 2022–2024 financial years and must be checked case by case. Currency rules run in parallel: a trustee payout credited to a beneficiary's foreign account has to clear the foreign-account and permitted-operations rules — see foreign account reporting for Russian residents.

When Residency Ends

The regime depends on Russian tax residency. Someone who spends fewer than 183 days in Russia across a calendar year stops being a resident and falls outside CFC reporting for that year, though determining the position for the year of departure is rarely straightforward and obligations already accrued do not vanish. Anyone restructuring around a foreign trust should settle the residency question first; see ending Russian tax residency and relocation from Russia. For an individual moving to an EU Member State, check its national trust-attribution rules separately: EU ATAD CFC rules do not by themselves require attribution to every individual settlor or beneficiary.

Settled Positions in Practice

Article 25.13 requires a factual analysis. For a non-settlor, control over profit-distribution decisions must coexist with one of the rights listed in paragraph 12; a first distribution alone does not establish controlling-person status. A settlor who retains a right to reclaim the assets, a right to income, or de facto control over trustee decisions remains a controlling person — the exit works only where the statutory conditions hold together: irrevocability, no entitlement to the profit, no power to dispose of it, no control. A foundation's legal personality does not by itself select the shareholding test: paragraph 15 extends the foreign-structure control rules to foreign legal entities whose personal law provides no participation in capital. Each position belongs in a tax memorandum tied to the trust deed and the parties' conduct, for the day the tax office reads the structure differently. Federal Tax Service Article 25.13.

Russia: the personal fund alternative

This is why a Russian personal fund (личный фонд) is often more straightforward for a resident than a foreign trust. It is governed by Russian law, so there is no CFC reporting and no beneficial-ownership question about an offshore entity. Its profit is taxed at a reduced 15%, against the 25% general corporate rate that applies from 2025, provided at least 90% of its income is passive; active business income returns it to 25%.

The fund's appeal goes beyond the rate. Moving assets into it is not itself a taxable event, and distributions to the founder's close family, meaning children, a spouse, or parents, are exempt from personal income tax. After the founder's death, payments to beneficiaries are exempt regardless of where they live or how they were related to the deceased, which makes the fund a practical succession vehicle. For the offshore comparison, see recognition of foreign trusts and private foundations.

Nine regimes that reach a trust

Trust-attribution rules extend beyond the EU and the United States. A family whose settlor and beneficiaries live in different countries meets a wider set of rules, and most of them are not labelled CFC at all: they are trust-attribution codes that do the same job — taxing income that nobody has received. The table sets the Russian rule beside eight others on the questions a structure is actually tested on: whether a trust is inside the perimeter, under which statute, whose income it becomes, what triggers the charge, whether undistributed income is taxed, and what has to be filed.

The scopes of attribution differ in two respects. Russia and Germany are the only systems in the set that subject a discretionary family trust to attribution by default — Russia through the settlor presumption, Germany through the family-foundation test — but apply different conditions: Russia taxes nothing below RUB 10 million of profit and lets a genuinely irrevocable, benefit-free settlor out, while § 15 AStG has no profit floor and leaves only the EU/EEA escape. The common-law systems do the same work with trust codes rather than CFC rules and key them to the settlor's retained benefit (the United Kingdom), the transfer by a US person (the United States) or a resident contributor (Canada). Switzerland and Italy attribute only where control or transparency is real.

The practical risk is double attribution. The rules do not coordinate with each other: a trust settled by a Russian resident with a child living in Munich can be a CFC of the settlor in Russia and, if the settlor is not taxable in Germany, attribute its income to the child under § 15(1) — two taxes on the same undistributed income, with the § 15(5) credit covering only tax levied on the trust itself. Mapping every controlling person's residence against this table is therefore the first step before any restructuring; the country-by-country consequences of a move are in relocating with a trust, and the choice of the trust's own jurisdiction in the trust jurisdictions map.

Profile → exposure