Wiki / Companies & funds / Incapacity Planning: Power of Attorney and Living Will

Companies & fundsEstate planning

Incapacity Planning: Power of Attorney and Living Will

the essentials on one page
share
LinkedIne-mail
mdmcp

Short History

The idea of directing your own medical care in advance is younger than it seems. The term living will was coined by the American lawyer Luis Kutner in 1969: he carried the logic of a will over to the case where a person is still alive but can no longer express their wishes. The first statute to recognise it was California's Natural Death Act of 1976 (in force from 1977), which established a patient's right to refuse life-sustaining treatment. By 1990 the idea had reached the federal level — the Patient Self-Determination Act required US hospitals working with Medicare and Medicaid to inform patients of their right to leave an advance directive.

The property side developed in parallel. An ordinary common-law power of attorney lapsed at exactly the moment it was needed most — when the principal lost capacity. That flaw was closed by the durable power of attorney in the United States and the enduring power of attorney in England: both keep running after incapacity sets in. In England and Wales the regime was rewritten by the Mental Capacity Act 2005 — the enduring power was replaced by the lasting power of attorney, with mandatory registration.

Concept

Estate planning thinks about death, but there is a scenario no less acute — incapacity: the owner is alive but cannot make decisions after a stroke, an accident, or an illness. Without documents prepared in advance, the assets and the person's own life fall into a legal vacuum.

Capacity ebbs away in different ways. It can vanish suddenly — a stroke, an accident, a coma — or fade over years with dementia, when a person still signs papers but no longer fully grasps the consequences. The law therefore assesses a specific decision at a specific moment: you can keep the capacity to handle everyday spending and lose it for selling a company at the same time. The documents are prepared in advance for a simple reason: once incapacity has set in, they can no longer be executed lawfully.

Power of Attorney

A long-term power of attorney (durable in the United States, lasting in England) names in advance the person who will manage property and affairs if the owner loses capacity. Without one, the family is left with the court: appointing a guardian or deputy is slow, public, and rarely ends with the person the owner would have chosen. The English lasting power of attorney also takes effect only after registration with the Office of the Public Guardian, so it cannot be arranged retroactively once capacity is already lost.

The English regime splits the instrument into two separate lasting powers of attorney: one for property and financial affairs — money, accounts, real estate, the other for health and welfare — treatment, care, place of residence. The property one can be put to use immediately after registration, while the principal is still capable; the medical one comes into play only when the principal can no longer decide. In the United States a power of attorney may be immediate (effective from signing) or springing (triggered by the onset of incapacity); the springing form has a downside — the moment of "triggering" has to be confirmed by a medical opinion, and some states have abandoned it.

Medical Directives

Here two different documents are at work. A living will (an advance decision about treatment) records the person's own wishes — for example, a refusal of artificial life support in a hopeless situation. A healthcare proxy (a power of attorney for medical decisions) appoints the person who will make the decisions the directive does not provide for. Together they spare the family both blind guesswork and quarrels at the bedside. In the United States both documents are grouped under the common name advance directive.

The cost of a missing document is measurable. The American Terri Schiavo fell into a persistent vegetative state in 1990 without leaving any written instructions; the dispute between her husband and her parents over withdrawing support dragged through the courts until 2005 and reached Congress. The federal rule grew out of an earlier case of the same kind — Nancy Cruzan's, decided by the US Supreme Court on 25 June 1990 — and later that year the Patient Self-Determination Act required that patients be asked whether they have an advance directive on admission to hospital.

Organ Donation

Organ donation is the decision that takes effect past the threshold of capacity, when the person can no longer say anything. Its modern framework took shape quickly and almost at the same time as the idea of the living will. In December 1967 Christiaan Barnard performed the first human heart transplant; by 1968 a Harvard committee had described "irreversible coma" and introduced the concept of brain death, and that same year produced the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act — the legal footing for consenting to donation during one's lifetime. By 1981 the Uniform Determination of Death Act had established that death means the irreversible cessation of either the heart and lungs or of the entire brain, including the brainstem.

From there countries diverged on how to seek consent. Opt-in — the United States, Germany — treats as a donor whoever signed up themselves: through a register or a mark on a driving licence. Opt-out, also known as presumed consent, treats as a donor everyone who has not expressly refused. More and more jurisdictions are taking this path: Spain since 1979, Wales since 2015, England since May 2020 (Max and Keira's Law), Scotland since 2021.

The law by itself decides little. Spain holds the world lead — 51.9 deceased donors per million in 2025, according to the national transplant organisation ONT, against 20.5 in the United Kingdom in 2025–26 on NHS Blood and Transplant figures — and the reason is the "Spanish model": transplant coordinators in every hospital and patient work with the family. Presumed consent here is only the backdrop; it is the infrastructure that delivers. Russia, incidentally, is also a presumed-consent country: a 1992 law treats as a donor any adult who did not declare a refusal during their lifetime — orally before witnesses or in writing; for minors the opposite presumption applies, and parental consent is required.

Cross-Border Recognition

The patchwork of national regimes is smoothed by the Hague Convention of 13 January 2000 on the International Protection of Adults. It sets which court has jurisdiction and which law applies when an incapacitated person has assets and interests in different countries, and it gives effect in one contracting state to a power of representation issued in another. The Convention has been in force since 1 January 2009, but the circle of participants is still narrow — some EU countries and, in the United Kingdom, only Scotland (the UK ratified it for Scotland alone and has not extended it to England and Wales). Outside that circle, manual legalisation remains: an apostille, a sworn translation, sometimes an opinion from a local lawyer.

Connection to Estate Planning

A complete plan covers three states of the owner: capacity (ordinary management), incapacity (power of attorney and directives), and death (will, foundation, trust). The middle link drops out more often than the others — and then the carefully assembled structure hangs in the air. It hits business hardest: if decisions rest on one person, their sudden incapacity halts the company no less than death would, which is why a power of attorney is tied to succession mechanisms.

When assets are held through a holding company, a foundation, or a trust, part of the problem is removed by the level of management itself: directors and the protector keep acting regardless of the founder's condition, and in a Private Trust Company the family's role can be divided among several people in advance. The power of attorney then covers the owner's personal perimeter — direct accounts, real estate, a vote at a meeting — while the structure holds the rest. These instruments are coordinated with one another so that the attorney, the protector, and the executor do not pull in different directions; questions of business succession and the family holding are resolved in the same document.

Incapacity is planned in advance with the same thinking as inheritance: a long-term power of attorney over property, medical directives for treatment and donation, coordination with a trust or holding. All of it is put in place while the person still has capacity — later, only the court remains.

Ten Countries: Which Document Survives Incapacity

The English and American instruments above are two versions of one idea; most countries a cross-border family deals with have their own, with a different form, a different trigger and a different fallback. The matrix sets ten of them side by side.

CountryInstrumentFormRegistrationTakes effectHague 2000 partyWithout it
England and Waleslasting power of attorney (property; health and welfare)prescribed form, certificate providerOffice of the Public Guardian, mandatoryproperty: on registration; welfare: on loss of capacityno (only Scotland is bound)Court of Protection deputy
United Statesdurable power of attorney; healthcare proxysigned, usually notarisednoneon signing or springing on incapacity; durable by default under the Uniform Power of Attorney Actnocourt guardianship or conservatorship
GermanyVorsorgevollmacht; Patientenverfügungwritten; notarial for land and many banksoptional, central register of the Federal Chamber of Notarieson signingyes, since 2009court-appointed carer; spouse emergency right for health up to 6 months (§ 1358 BGB)
Francemandat de protection future (arts. 477–494 Code civil)notarial or private deedactivated at the court registryon a medical certificate of incapacityyes, since 2009tutelle or curatelle by the judge
SwitzerlandVorsorgeauftrag (arts. 360–369 ZGB)handwritten or notarialdeposit notified to the civil registerwhen the adult protection authority (KESB) validates ityes, since 2009KESB-appointed curator
Spainpoderes preventivos after the 2021 reformnotarialcivil registeron signing or on incapacity, as draftednojudicial curatela
Italyno lasting power; advance designation of an amministratore di sostegno (art. 408 c.c.)public deed or authenticated private deed—only when the guardianship judge appointssigned, not ratifiedamministratore di sostegno appointed by the court
Singaporelasting power of attorney (Mental Capacity Act 2008)prescribed form, certificate issuerOffice of the Public Guardian, mandatoryon loss of capacitynocourt-appointed deputy
Hong Kongenduring power of attorney (Cap. 501), finance onlysigned before a doctor and a solicitorHigh Court on incapacityon registration after incapacitynocommittee under the Mental Health Ordinance
UAEno statutory lasting power———nocourt-appointed guardian

The matrix splits the ten into three families. The first — England and Wales, Singapore and Hong Kong — makes registration with a public office part of the instrument: the document does nothing until it is on the register, and a bank will ask for the registered copy. The second — Germany, Spain and the United States — lets the power work from signature, with registration optional or absent; it is the easiest to use and the easiest to dispute, because a bank abroad has no register to check. The third family has no private lasting power at all: in Italy the most a person can do is designate in advance whom the judge should appoint, and in the UAE the court decides. France and Switzerland sit between the first and second: the document is private, but it starts working only when a registry or the protection authority confirms the incapacity.

The Hague Convention of 2000 now binds sixteen states — among them Germany, France, Switzerland, Portugal, Cyprus, Belgium, Greece and, since September 2024, Ireland — but not England and Wales, Spain, Italy, the United States or any Asian centre. For a family whose assets sit in both groups, the convention therefore helps only on one side of the border. The practical answer is the same as for wills: one document per key country, each drafted in local form and each acknowledging the others, with the English LPA and the German Vorsorgevollmacht usually the two anchors.

Worked example: one owner, three banks

A German resident owns a London flat, holds an account in Zurich and a brokerage account in Singapore, and signs a notarial Vorsorgevollmacht in Munich. After a stroke, the German document works at once in Germany and, through the Hague Convention, is capable of recognition in Switzerland, where the Zurich bank will still ask for its own form and may refer to the protection authority. In London it does not operate on land: the flat can be sold only under a registered English LPA or by a deputy appointed by the Court of Protection, a process measured in months. Singapore will not act on the German power at all without a Singapore LPA or a court order. Two extra documents signed in advance — an English property LPA and a Singapore LPA — would have replaced two court applications.

Profile to package

Asset mapDocuments to sign while capable
Continental Europe onlyhome-country power plus reliance on the Hague Convention between parties; a local notarial power where the bank asks
Plus English property or accountsEnglish property LPA registered with the OPG
Plus Singapore or Hong KongSingapore LPA or Hong Kong EPA
Assets in Italy or the UAEadvance designation of an administrator in Italy; move UAE assets into a structure whose directors keep acting
Operating businesscorporate powers in the articles plus the personal power covering shareholder votes

Q/A

Which countries have no equivalent of a lasting power of attorney?

Of the ten in the table, Italy and the UAE. In Italy a person can only designate in advance the amministratore di sostegno whom the guardianship judge should appoint; in the UAE the court appoints a guardian. In both, assets that must remain manageable are better placed in a company, foundation or trust whose management continues regardless of the owner's condition.

Does the 2000 Hague Convention make my German power valid in London?

No. The United Kingdom's ratification extends only to Scotland, so England and Wales apply their own rules and expect a registered LPA or a Court of Protection order. Between the sixteen contracting states — Germany, France, Switzerland and Portugal among them — a power of representation made in one is capable of recognition in the others.

I have a will — does it not cover incapacity?

No: a will works only after death. The gap is closed by two other documents — a long-term power of attorney over property and affairs (durable in the United States, lasting in England) and medical directives for treatment. Without them the family is left with the court, and appointing a guardian or deputy is slow, public and rarely ends with the person the owner would have chosen.

My father is no longer fully lucid — can he still grant a power of attorney?

As a rule, no: once capacity is lost the document can no longer be executed lawfully, and an English lasting power of attorney additionally takes effect only after registration with the Office of the Public Guardian, so it cannot be arranged retroactively. The law assesses a specific decision at a specific moment: capacity for everyday spending does not amount to capacity to grant a power over the sale of a company.

Does an English lasting power of attorney take effect as soon as it is signed?

No — only once it is registered with the Office of the Public Guardian, and what follows depends on the type. The property and financial affairs LPA can be used straight after registration, with the donor's permission, while the donor still has capacity; the health and welfare LPA comes into play only when the donor can no longer decide.

Will a power of attorney from one country be accepted by a bank or hospital abroad?

Only under the law of the country where it is presented. The 2000 Hague Convention on the International Protection of Adults gives effect in one contracting state to a power of representation issued in another, but the circle is narrow: it has been in force since 1 January 2009, and the UK ratification binds only Scotland — it has not been extended to England and Wales. Outside it, an apostille and a sworn translation remain.

Could a living will refusing life support get in the way of organ donation?

It can: retrieval sometimes requires the body to be kept on machines, while the directive instructs that they be switched off. The two scenarios are therefore separated in the document itself, in advance. Wishes on donation are recorded alongside the medical directives — in an opt-in jurisdiction enrolling the person as a donor, in an opt-out jurisdiction recording a refusal.

Let’s discuss your situation

Dana Berzeg
Dana BerzegAttorney-at-law, Family Office

Or send us a message

We’ll reply to the email address you provide.

Your contacts are used to answer this request. No mailing lists.