# Luxembourg: необанк and payment licence (CSSF) > необанк and payment licence in Luxembourg: CSSF, capital, EEA passporting, MiCA/CASP and stablecoins. Why Ripple, Coinbase and Amazon chose Luxembourg. Author: Алёна Дунаева — юрист, Family Office (https://wiki.private.law/authors/dunaeva) Last modified: 2026-06-14T10:40:00.000Z Canonical: https://wiki.private.law/en/neobank-luxembourg Topics: banking Jurisdictions: luxembourg, eu Functional tags: license, neobank, stablecoin, crypto-friendly, corporate-banking, license-vasp-mica Semantic tags: license, neobank, stablecoin, crypto-friendly, corporate-banking, license-vasp-mica --- When a large fintech enters the European Union, it almost always chooses between three doors: fast and cheap Lithuania, the Irish hub with Stripe and Payoneer — and Luxembourg. Luxembourg is more expensive and slower than both, yet the heaviest players come here. Here is what the local regulator grants and why the 'premium' licence often beats the fast one. ## What the CSSF grants The regulator is the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF). The line-up is standard for the EU: the neobank (PI) under PSD2 — transfers, acquiring, open banking; the e-money licence (neobank) under EMD2 — issuing electronic money plus everything a PI may do, at a minimum capital of €350k; plus AISP registration. Any of these licences passports across all 30 EEA countries — one regulator, thirty markets. Timing and cost are not Lithuanian: the application runs about €30k and the process takes 6 to 12 months, and the CSSF is known for its thoroughness. But that thoroughness is the product: a CSSF licence and a Luxembourg bank account raise no questions with correspondents and counterparties. ## Why Luxembourg specifically Lithuania wins on speed and price, Ireland on its English-speaking environment and large players such as Stripe. Luxembourg wins on institutional trust. It is a financial centre with Europe's largest fund industry, depositaries, private banks and a reputation built over decades. For an issuer that needs to be accepted by tier-1 banks and institutional partners, that is decisive. After Brexit, Luxembourg deliberately assembled a payments hub: firms losing their UK passport moved their European subsidiaries here. The CSSF turned from a largely fund-focused regulator into one of the EU's key supervisors of payment and e-money institutions. ## Who is based here The anchor examples are long-standing: PayPal operates from Luxembourg under a full CSSF banking licence since 2007, and Amazon Payments Europe holds an neobank here (licence 36/10). Alongside them sit J.P. Morgan Mobility Payments Solution and names familiar in cross-border settlement — LianLian Europe, PingPong Europe, 3S Money Luxembourg and Vivid Money. > 🍓 Luxembourg is the 'grown-up' payment licence: pricier and slower than Lithuania, but with an EEA passport and correspondent trust. That is why Amazon and J.P. Morgan are here. ## The 2026 crypto wave: neobank plus MiCA In 2026 Luxembourg became the entry point for regulated crypto. Ripple obtained a full EU neobank licence from the CSSF in February (for the RLUSD stablecoin and EEA-wide payments), and Coinbase on 5 March (the right to make credit transfers and issue electronic money). The logic is simple: a stablecoin under MiCA is an e-money token (EMT), and only a bank or an neobank may issue it. So crypto businesses that need a European stablecoin or a regulated wallet come for the 'neobank + CASP under one regulator' combination. A MiCA CASP licence can be standalone or an add-on to an e-money licence, and Luxembourg lets you hold both under one CSSF roof. This is precisely the dual-licensing without which an EMT is illegal in the EU. > 🔗 **Related** > [Crypto & CASP](https://wiki.private.law/en/casp-license-luxembourg) · [White-label CASP](https://wiki.private.law/en/white-label-casp) ## How it fits with funds and a holding company A payment licence is rarely taken in a vacuum. In Luxembourg it is naturally placed next to a holding company (SOPARFI) or a fund structure: one jurisdiction, one regulator, one expert ecosystem and the same correspondents. So an neobank here is part of a broader picture, not a standalone product. > 🍓 An neobank/PI out of Luxembourg = a passport to 30 EEA countries plus institutional trust plus the option to add a CASP under MiCA. The cost is higher and slower than Lithuania; the upside is that the licence and account are accepted where the fast one is not. > 🔗 **Related** > [Luxembourg](https://wiki.private.law/en/luxembourg) · [Crypto & CASP](https://wiki.private.law/en/casp-license-luxembourg) · [Banking](https://wiki.private.law/en/banking-luxembourg) · [White-label CASP](https://wiki.private.law/en/white-label-casp) --- ## Factual claims - Timing and cost are not Lithuanian: the application runs about €30k and the process takes 6 to 12 months, and the CSSF is known for its thoroughness. - The anchor examples are long-standing: PayPal operates from Luxembourg under a full CSSF banking licence since 2007, and Amazon Payments Europe holds an необанк here (licence 36/10). - In 2026 Luxembourg became the entry point for regulated crypto.